Comparing an Artificial Neural Network and a physically-based model for landslide hazard zonation
Mihai R Pavel, Jonathan Fannin, John D Nelson
Dans les comptes rendus d’articles de la conférence: GeoEdmonton '08: 61st Canadian Geotechnical Conference and the 9th Joint CGS/IAH-CNC Groundwater ConferenceSession: M1B GIS and Remote Sensing
Submit a Data Update Form for this paper
Please include this code when submitting a data update via other methods: GEO2008_66
Retrouver cet article:
Les membres de la Société canadienne de géotechnique peuvent accéder à cet article, ainsi qu'à tous les autres articles de la Conférence Géotechnique Canadienne, dans le Espace membre. Les comptes rendus d'articles sont également disponibles dans de nombreuses bibliothèques.
Citer cet article:
Pavel, Mihai R, Fannin, Jonathan, Nelson, John D (2008) Comparing an Artificial Neural Network and a physically-based model for landslide hazard zonation in GEO2008. Ottawa, Ontario: Canadian Geotechnical Society.
@inproceedings{Pavel_GEO2008_66,
author = {{Pavel, Mihai R}, {Fannin, Jonathan}, {Nelson, John D}}
title = {Comparing an Artificial Neural Network and a physically-based model for landslide hazard zonation}
booktitle = {Proceedings of the 61st Canadian Geotechnical Conference and the 9th Joint CGS/IAH-CNC Groundwater Conference}
year = {2008}
organization = {The Canadian Geotechnical Society},
address = {Ottawa, Canada} }
title = {Comparing an Artificial Neural Network and a physically-based model for landslide hazard zonation}
booktitle = {Proceedings of the 61st Canadian Geotechnical Conference and the 9th Joint CGS/IAH-CNC Groundwater Conference}
year = {2008}
organization = {The Canadian Geotechnical Society},
address = {Ottawa, Canada} }